‘Hemiepiphyte’: a confusing term and its history (Viewpoint)
annals-of-botany

‘Hemiepiphyte’: a confusing term and its history (Viewpoint)

Zotz suggests a more coherent scheme to categorize structurally dependent flora that discards the misleading term secondary hemiepiphyte.

https://www.botany.one/hemiepiphyte-a-confusing-term-and-its-history-viewpoint/

Know someone who'd like this?

‘Hemiepiphyte’: a confusing term and its history (Viewpoint)
‘Hemiepiphyte’: a confusing term and its history (Viewpoint)

There are many types of structurally dependent plants and, ignoring parasitic mistletoes, it is usual to distinguish four functional groups: (1) true epiphytes; (2) primary hemiepiphytes; (3) secondary hemiepiphytes; and (4) climbing plants (lianas and vines). Based on a review of the relevant literature over the last 120 years, Zotz identifies serious problems with the current use of terminology. Arguing that current ambiguities hamper integration and generalization, he suggests a more coherent scheme to categorize structurally dependent flora that discards the misleading term secondary hemiepiphyte.

Liked this article?

The nonprofit plant magazine

Lab science. Citizen science. Your source for plant science.