Exquisitely preserved tiny fossils are key for understanding moss evolution

Tiny 135-million-year-old moss fossils found in rocks from western Canada preserve exquisite anatomical details. These fossils open an unexpected window on moss evolution, as they allow for recognition of living moss lineages deep in the fossil record. This way, they add to the notoriously sparse fossil record of the group.

Click images to enlarge

Cretaceous rocks on Vancouver Island (British Columbia) (FIG 1) are revealing rich assemblages of plant fossils (FIG 2) that contain a broad diversity of minute mosses. The moss fossils show unexpectedly delicate anatomical detail at very small scales. Some reveal the arrangement of diverse cell types making up the diminutive leaves (FIG 3). Others preserve structures for asexual reproduction (gemmae) only one tenth of a millimeter across (FIG 4), or sperm sacs just slightly bigger than the gemmae (FIG 5). Even details as small as the geometry of individual cell walls (FIG 6) or intracellular interactions with fungi (FIG 7) and microscopic evidence for herbivory (FIG 8) can be observed.

Luckily, uncovering such fine details does not require sophisticated methods, but just the cellulose acetate peel technique, traditionally employed by coal-ball paleobotanists for more than a half-century. The technique involves polishing flat surfaces of the rock and etching them with acid to expose the plant material, which is then picked up on acetone-soluble plastic sheets (‘peels’). All this is possible because the plant material, including all the mosses, was washed off the Cretaceous landmasses by streams flowing into the sea, where the plants sank and were buried in near-shore sediments. The sediments then became cemented around the plants at locations where submarine freshwater springs seeped in, precipitating calcium carbonate.

Given their diminutive size, it would not surprise anyone that classifying and identifying mosses often relies on intricate details of their anatomy. However, fossils aren’t famous for their completeness – the finer details are the first to be erased when the going gets tough, during processes involved in fossilization. Thus, discovering fossils that preserve minute anatomical details is rare, but also crucial for understanding where each of them fits in classifications. One important thing the Canadian fossils tell us is that the deep history of mosses includes significant amounts of extinct diversity that can only be gleaned by searching the rock record. Equally important, these fossils reveal the presence of several major moss lineages that have living representatives, much earlier than previously thought.

Why are all these important? First, because they fill major gaps in the fossil record. Ever since Darwin’s famous complaint, botanists and biologists alike have decried the imperfection of the geological record in representing the diversity of past life. This real challenge of past biodiversity studies is exacerbated in the case of mosses, for reasons that are just starting to become more apparent. That is why the abundant and diverse Canadian fossil mosses are a treasure-trove. Some of the fossils increase the minimum age of their lineage by 50 million years or more, while others represent the only fossil records of their lineage, known to date. Such data are crucial as calibration points, improving the accuracy of molecular clocks used for dating evolutionary events, as well as for inclusion in studies of evolutionary relationships, to which they contribute resolution.

Second, the Canadian material demonstrates the importance of moss fossils that preserve detailed anatomy for understanding the evolution of the group. In turn, this highlights the need to find and to study additional occurrences of mosses with this type of preservation.

The Cretaceous in North America
Fig. 9. Documented occurrences of fossil mosses with preserved anatomy (red dots) in Cretaceous rocks of the west coast of North America.
Preserved mosses discovered in Upper Jurassic rocks of Argentinean Patagonia
Fig. 10. Stem fragment of fossil moss from Jurassic rocks of Argentinean Patagonia explored by a team led by CONICET scientists Juan García Massini (Centro Regional de Investigaciones Científicas y Transferencia Tecnológica, Anillaco), and Ignacio Escapa (Museo Paleontológico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew)

Third, the Canadian fossils helped us develop thoroughly validated search images for anatomically preserved mosses and the rocks that host them. As a result, we now have observations and reports of such fossils from several other locations on Vancouver Island and in California that span most of the Cretaceous (Valanginian to Campanian, about 135-75 million years ago) (FIG 9). These, and even older (155 million years) anatomically preserved mosses discovered in Upper Jurassic rocks of Argentinean Patagonia (FIG 10), await in-depth characterization and are bound to illuminate equally important aspects of the deep evolutionary history of mosses.

Mosses include at least 7000 species alive today (and some scholars count at least 13000). If what we know about plant evolution is correct, bryophytes (which include mosses) are at least 440 million years old. Understanding the origin and tempo of evolution of the broad living diversity of mosses would be impossible without reaching deep into the fossil record, just like without knowledge of the 7 million-year-old hominid fossil record we would lack an understanding of the origins of our own species. Ultimately, this is why these moss fossils with their high-resolution anatomical information are so important.

Reference List

Tomescu, A. M. F. (2016). The Early Cretaceous Apple Bay flora of Vancouver Island: a hotspot of fossil bryophyte diversity. Botany, 94(9), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2016-0054

Bippus, A. C., Stockey, R. A., Rothwell, G. W., & Tomescu, A. M. F. (2017). Extending the fossil record of Polytrichaceae: Early Cretaceous Meantoinea alophosioides gen. et sp. nov., permineralized gametophytes with gemma cups from Vancouver Island. American Journal of Botany, 104(4), 584–597. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1700002

Shelton, G. W. K., Stockey, R. A., Rothwell, G. W., & Tomescu, A. M. F. (2015). Exploring the fossil history of pleurocarpous mosses: Tricostaceae fam. nov. from the Cretaceous of Vancouver Island, Canada. American Journal of Botany, 102(11), 1883–1900. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1500360

Savoretti, A., Bippus, A. C., Stockey, R. A., Rothwell, G. W., & Tomescu, A. M. F. (2018). Grimmiaceae in the Early Cretaceous: Tricarinella crassiphylla gen. et sp. nov. and the value of anatomically preserved bryophytes. Annals of Botany, 121(7), 1275–1286. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcy015

Shelton, G. W. K., Stockey, R. A., Rothwell, G. W., & Tomescu, A. M. F. (2016). Krassiloviella limbelloides gen. et sp. nov.: Additional Diversity in the Hypnanaean Moss Family Tricostaceae (Valanginian, Vancouver Island, British Columbia). International Journal of Plant Sciences, 177(9), 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1086/688707

Tomescu, A. M. F., Bomfleur, B., Bippus, A.C., Savoretti, A. (2018). 'Why Are Bryophytes So Rare in the Fossil Record? A Spotlight on Taphonomy and Fossil Preservation' in Krings, M, Harper, C.J., Cuneo, N.R., Rothwell, G.W. (eds.) Transformative Paleobotany. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813012-4.00016-4 (ResearchGate)

Bippus, A. C., Escapa, I. E., & Tomescu, A. M. F. (2018). Wanted dead or alive (probably dead): Stem group Polytrichaceae. American Journal of Botany. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1096

Massini, J. G., Escapa, I. H., Guido, D. M., & Channing, A. (2016). First Glimpse of the Silicified Hot Spring Biota from a New Jurassic Chert Deposit in the Deseado Massif, Patagonia, Argentina. Ameghiniana, 53(2), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.26.01.2016.2916

Hyvönen, J., Koskinen, S., Smith Merrill, G. L., Hedderson, T. A., & Stenroos, S. (2004). Phylogeny of the Polytrichales (Bryophyta) based on simultaneous analysis of molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 31(3), 915–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.003

Salamon, M. A., Gerrienne, P., Steemans, P., Gorzelak, P., Filipiak, P., Le Hérissé, A., … Trela, W. (2018). Putative Late Ordovician land plants. New Phytologist, 218(4), 1305–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15091